BILLINGS, Montana - an environmental group has asked a federal judge Monday to the action of delay on draft legal regulations that would require the Government to consider new measures of protection for hundreds of plants and animals in danger.
The Center for biological diversity filed to keep documents in Washington, D.C., seeking to put on the settlement agreement. Tucson, Arizona, group said the deal was hatched in secret and suffers from serious shortcomings.
A announced last week, the agreement between the administration of the Obama and WildEarth guardians based out of Denver received high praise from several conservation groups.
It will address a backlog of 251 endangered species currently listed as "candidates" that the Government lacks the resources to provide protections. Those who understand species widely recognized as the great sage grouse and lynx of the Canada and dozens of lesser known plants and animals.
But the Center for biological diversity has criticized the agreement for leave on some species that could be damaged by climate change, including walrus Pacific and Wolverine. The Group also argues that the transaction is not enforceable.
The Centre is not a direct party to the 12 cases referred by the regulations, but is a plaintiff in a related case. Giving it a potential legal leverage to influence the adoption of the agreement.
"We basically want the Court to maintain distance on approving the settlement agreement until we had the opportunity to explain our concerns and negotiate with the Government," said Noah Greenwald, species endangered of the program coordinator for the Centre.
The approval of the Court of the settlement agreement is pending. A hearing in the case is set at Tuesday in Washington.
Solicitors for the Government and WildEarth guardians filed documents Monday, arguing that the Center for biological diversity could not amend the regulations proposed at this stage.
Approval of the agreement would speed up decisions on endangered species which, in some cases have languished for more than 30 years, said Nicole Rosmarino with WildEarth guardians.
Under the agreement, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service also solve petitions seeking protections on approximately 600 additional species.
"The more important question is whether if the status quo is serving (endangered species) better than our agreement with the Ministry of the Interior." "I think that any reasonable person could say no," said Rosmarino. "Clearly we need to get the ball and the address of the fate met by these plants and endangered animals.".
没有评论:
发表评论